Product Code Database
Example Keywords: world of -e-readers $51-160
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: List Of Most Massive Stars
Tag Wiki 'List Of Most Massive Stars'.
Tag

This is a list of the most massive stars that have been discovered, in units ().


Uncertainties and caveats
Most of the masses listed below are contested and, being the subject of current research, remain under review and subject to constant revision of their masses and other characteristics. Indeed, many of the masses listed in the table below are inferred from theory, using difficult measurements of the ' temperatures, , and absolute brightnesses. All the masses listed below are uncertain: Both the theory and the measurements are pushing the limits of current knowledge and technology. Both theories and measurements could be incorrect.


Complications with distance and obscuring clouds
Since massive stars are rare, must look very far from to find them. All the listed stars are many thousands of light years away, which makes measurements difficult. In addition to being far away, many stars of such extreme mass are surrounded by clouds of outflowing gas created by extremely powerful ; the surrounding gas interferes with the already difficult-to-obtain measurements of stellar temperatures and brightnesses, which greatly complicates the issue of estimating internal chemical compositions and structures. This obstruction leads to difficulties in determining the parameters needed to calculate the star's mass.

Both the obscuring clouds and the great distances also make it difficult to judge whether the star is just a single supermassive object or, instead, a multiple star system. A number of the "stars" listed below may actually be two or more companions orbiting too closely for our telescopes to distinguish, each star possibly being massive in itself but not necessarily "supermassive" to either be on this list, or near the top of it. And certainly other combinations are possible – for example a supermassive star with one or more smaller companions or more than one giant star – but without being able to clearly see inside the surrounding cloud, it is difficult to know what kind of object is actually generating the bright point of light seen from the Earth.

More globally, statistics on stellar populations seem to indicate that the upper mass limit is in the 120-solar-mass range, so any mass estimate above this range is suspect.


Rare reliable estimates
Eclipsing binary stars are the only stars whose masses are estimated with some confidence. However, note that almost all of the masses listed in the table below were inferred by indirect methods; only a few of the masses in the table were determined using eclipsing systems.

Amongst the most reliable listed masses are those for the eclipsing binaries NGC 3603-A1, WR 21a, and WR 20a. Masses for all three were obtained from orbital measurements. This involves measuring their and also their light curves. The radial velocities only yield minimum values for the masses, depending on inclination, but light curves of eclipsing binaries provide the missing information: inclination of the orbit to our line of sight.


Relevance of stellar evolution
Some stars may once have been more massive than they are today. Many large stars have likely suffered significant mass loss (perhaps as much as several tens of solar masses). The lost mass is expected to have been expelled by : high velocity winds that are driven by the hot into interstellar space. The process forms an enlarged extended envelope around the star that interacts with the nearby interstellar medium and infuses the adjacent volume of space with elements heavier than hydrogen or helium.

There are also – or rather were – stars that might have appeared on the list but no longer exist as stars, or are supernova impostors; today we see only their debris. The masses of the precursor stars that fueled these destructive events can be estimated from the type of explosion and the energy released, but those masses are not listed here.

This list only concerns "living" stars – those which are still seen by Earth-based observers existing as active stars: Still engaged in interior that generates heat and light. That is, the light now arriving at the Earth as images of the stars listed still shows them to internally generate new energy as of the time (in the distant past) that light now being received was emitted. The list specifically excludes both – former stars that are now seen to be "dead" but radiating residual heat – and – fragmentary remains of exploded stars which have gravitationally collapsed, even though accretion disks surrounding those black holes might generate heat or light exterior to the star's remains (now inside the black hole), radiated by infalling matter (see § Black holes below).


Mass limits
There are two related theoretical limits on how massive a star can possibly be: The accretion mass limit and the Eddington mass limit.

  • The accretion limit is related to star formation: After about have accreted in a , the combined mass should have become hot enough for its heat to drive away any further incoming matter. In effect, the protostar reaches a point where it evaporates away material already collected as fast as it collects new material.
  • The Eddington limit is based on light pressure from the core of an already-formed star: As mass increases past the intensity of light radiated from a star's core will become sufficient for the light-pressure pushing outward to exceed the gravitational force pulling inward, and the surface material of the star will be free to float away into space. Since their different compositions make them more transparent, and stars have higher and much higher mass limits, respectively.


Accretion limits
Astronomers have long hypothesized that as a grows to a size beyond something drastic must happen. Although the limit can be stretched for very early stars, and although the exact value is uncertain, if any stars still exist above they would challenge current theories of stellar evolution.

Studying the , which is currently the densest known cluster of stars in , astronomers have confirmed that no stars in that cluster exceed about

Rare ultramassive stars that exceed this limit – for example in the R136 star cluster – might be explained by an exceptional event hypothesized to have occurred: some of the pairs of massive in young, unstable multiple-star systems must, on rare occasions, collide and merge when certain unusual circumstances hold that make a collision possible.


Eddington mass limit
's limit on stellar mass arises because of light-pressure: For a sufficiently massive star the outward pressure of generated by in the star's core exceeds the inward pull of its own gravity. The lowest mass for which this effect is active is the .

Stars of greater mass have a higher rate of core energy generation, and heavier stars' luminosities increase far out of proportion to the increase in their masses. The is the point beyond which a star ought to push itself apart, or at least shed enough mass to reduce its internal energy generation to a lower, maintainable rate. The actual limit-point mass depends on how opaque the gas in the star is, and metal-rich stars have lower mass limits than metal-poor stars. Before their demise, the hypothetical metal-free stars would have had the highest allowed mass, somewhere around 300 .

In theory, a more massive star could not hold itself together because of the mass loss resulting from the outflow of stellar material. In practice the theoretical must be modified for high luminosity stars and the empirical Humphreys–Davidson limit is used instead.


List of the most massive known stars
+ Legend

The following two lists show a few of the known stars, including the stars in , , and H II regions. Despite their high luminosity, many of them are nevertheless too distant to be observed with the naked eye. Stars that are at least sometimes visible to the unaided eye have their apparent magnitude (6.5 or brighter) highlighted in blue.

The first list gives stars that are estimated to be 60  or larger; the majority of which are shown. The second list includes some notable stars which are below 60  for the purpose of comparison. The method used to determine each star's mass is included to give an idea of the data's uncertainty; note that the mass of binary stars can be determined far more accurately. The masses listed below are the stars' current (evolved) mass, not their initial (formation) mass.

R136a1 163,000WN5h12.2346,000
BAT99-98 226165,000WN613.3745,000
R136a2 163,000WN5h12.3450,000
Melnick 42 189163,000O2If*12.7847,300
R136a3 163,000WN5h12.9750,000
VFTS 1022 178164,000O3.5If*/WN713.4742,200
Westerhout 51-57 16020,000O4V16.66
42,700
VFTS 682 153164,000WN5h16.0852,200
HD 15558 A 24,400O5.5III(f)7.87
39,500
Westerhout 51-3 20,000O3-8V17.79
39,800
Melnick 34 A 163,000WN5h13.09
53,000
R136c 142163,000WN5h13.4351,000
VFTS 1021 141164,000O4 If+13.3539,800
LH 10-3209 A 140160,000O3III(f*)11.859
42,500
Melnick 34 B 163,000WN5h13.09
53,000
Westerhout 51d 13520,000 15.11
42,700
VFTS 545 133164,000O2If*/WN513.3247,300
HD 97950 B 13224,800WN6h11.3342,000
HD 269810 130163,000O2III(f*)12.2252,500
R136a7 127163,000O3III(f*)13.9754,000
WR 42e 12325,000O3If*/WN614.5343,000
VFTS 506 122164,000ON2V((n))((f*))13.3147,300
HD 97950 A1a 12024,800WN6h11.18
42,000
LSS 4067 12011,000O4.5Ifpe11.4440,000
WR 93 1205,900WC710.6871,000
Sk -69° 212 119160,000O6If12.41645,400
Sk -69° 249 A 119160,000O7If12.02
38,900
ST5-31 119160,000O2-3(n)fp12.27350,700
R136a5 116157,000O2I(n)f*13.7148,000
MSP 183 11520,000O3V(f)13.87846,300
WR 24 11414,000WN6ha-w6.4850,100
HD 97950 C1 11324,800WN6h11.89
44,000 This is a binary system but the secondary is much less massive than the primary.
-F9 111.325,000WN8-9h16.1
36,600
Cygnus OB2 #12 A 1105,200B3–4 Ia+11.702
13,700
HD 93129 Aa 1107,500O2If6.9
42,500
HSH95-36 110163,000O2 If*14.4149,500
R146 109164,000WN413.1163,000
R136a4 108157,000O3 V((f*))(n)13.4150,000
VFTS 621 107164,000O2V((f*))z15.3954,000
R136a6 105157,000O2I(n)f*p13.3552,000
Melnick 39 A 160,000O2.5 If/WN613.0
44,000
Westerhout 49-3 10536,200O3-O7V16.689
40,700
WR 21a A 103.626,100O3/WN5ha12.66145,000
R99 103164,000Ofpe/WN911.5228,000
-F6 10125,000WN8-9h15.75
33,900
Sk -65° 47 101160,000O4If12.46647,800
-F1 100.925,000WN8-9h16.3
33,200
HD 37836Large Magellanic Cloud100163,000B0Iae10.5528,200 SIMBAD
Peony Star 10026,000Ofpe/WN912.978
25,100
VFTS 457 100164,000O3.5If*/WN713.7439,800
A 1007,500LBV4.3
9,400–35,200
Mercer 30-1 A 9940,000O6-7.5If+10.33
32,200 Mercer 30 is an open cluster in Dragonfish Nebula.
Sk -68° 137 99160,000OB13.34650,000
WR 25 A 986,500O2.5If*8.8
50,100
BI 253 97.6164,000O2V13.7654,000
R136a8 96157,000O2–3V14.4249,500
HD 38282 B 95163,000WN6/7h11.11
47,000
HM 1-6 9511,000O5.5Ifc11.6444,700
NGC 3603-42 9525,000O3III12.8650,000
R139 A 95163,000O6.5Iafc11.94
35,000
BAT99-6 94165,000O6-7n-nn+WN5-6-A11.9556,000
Sk -66° 172 94160,000O2III(f*)+OB13.146,300 N64 is an emission nebula in Large Magellanic Cloud.
ST2-22 94160,000O3.5III(f+)14.351,300
VFTS 259 94164,000O6Iaf13.6537,600
VFTS 562 94164,000O4III(f)13.6642,200
24,800WN6h11.18
37,000
VFTS 512 93164,000O2V-III((f*))14.2847,300
R136b 92163,000WN9ha13.2435,500
VFTS 16 91.6164,000O2IIIf*13.5550,600
HD 97950 A3 9124,800O3III(f*)12.9550,000
NGC 346-W1 91200,000O4If+O5-612.5743,400
Westerhout 49-2 90–240,36,200O2-3.5If*18.246
35,500
R127 90160,000LBV10.1510,000–27,000
VFTS 333 90164,000O7/8II12.4937,600
VFTS 267 89164,000O3III-I(n)f*13.4944,700
VFTS 64 88164,000O7.5II(f)14.62139,800
BAT99-80 A 87165,000O4If+OB13
45,000
R140b 87165,000WN612.6647,000
VFTS 542 87164,000O2If*/WN513.4744,700
VFTS 599 87164,000O3III(f*)13.844,700
WR 89 8711,000WN8h11.0239,800
-F7 86.325,000WN8-9h15.74
32,900
Sk -69° 104 86160,000O6Ib(f)12.139,900
VFTS 1017 86164,000 14.550,100
LH 10-3061 85160,000ON2III(f*)13.49152,000
Sk 80 85200,000O7Iaf+12.3138,900
VFTS 603 85164,000O4III(fc)13.9942,200
Sk -70° 91 84.09165,000O2III(f*)+OB12.7848,900 BSDL 1830 is a star cluster in Large Magellanic Cloud.
R147 84164,000WN5h12.99347,300
HD 93250 A 83.37,500O4III(fc)7.5
46,000
83163,000 13.79
50,000
WR 20a A 82.720,000O3If*/WN6+O3If*/WN613.28
43,000
TIC 276934932 A 82160,000O3If+O6V14.05
45,000
WR 20a B 81.920,000O3If*/WN6+O3If*/WN613.28
43,000
Trumpler 27-27 813,900O8III13.3137,000
BAT99-96 80165,000WN813.7642,000
HD 15570 807,500O4If8.1146,000
HD 38282 A 80163,000WN5/6h+WN6/7h11.11
47,000
HSH95-46 80163,000 14.5647,500
Melnick 39 B 160,000O3 V-III13.0
48,000
-F15 79.725,000O4-6If16.12
35,600
BI 237 79.66165,000O2V(f*)13.8351,300 BSDL 2527 is a star cluster in Large Magellanic Cloud.
VFTS 94 79164,000O3.5Inf*p+sec?14.16142,200
VFTS 151 79164,000O6.5II(f)p14.1342,200
LH 41-32 78160,000O4III13.08648,200
Pismis 24-17 785,900O3.5III(f*)11.8442,700
VFTS 404 78164,000O3.5V(n)((fc))14.1444,700
Westerhout 51-2 20,000O3-5V13.68
42,700
BAT99-68 76165,000O3If*/WN614.1345,000 BSDL 2505 is a star cluster in Large Magellanic Cloud.
HD 93632 7610,000O5Ifvar8.2345,400
NGC 346-W3 76200,000O2III(f)12.852,500
VFTS 169 76164,000O2.5V(n)((f*))14.43747,300
VFTS 440 76164,000O6-6.5II(f)12.04639,800
AB1 75197,000WN3+O4:15.23879,000 DEM S10 is a H II region in Small Magellanic Cloud.
WR 22 A 758,300WN7h+O9III-V6.42
44,700 Bochum 10 is an open cluster in Carina Nebula.
Pismis 24-1NE 746,500 1142,500
VFTS 608 74164,000O4III(f)14.2242,200
HSH95-31 73163,000 14.1247,500
Mercer 30-3 7340,000O6If12.62
39,300
Mercer 30-11 7340,000O5.5-6I-II12.33
36,800
VFTS 566 73164,000O3III(f*)14.0544,700
LH 64-16 72160,000ON2III(f*)13.66650,900
NGC 2044-W35 72160,000O4III14.148,200
VFTS 216 72164,000O4V((fc))14.38944,700
ST2-1 71160,000O5.5III14.344,100
VFTS 3 71164,000B1Ia+11.5621,000
24,800WN6h11.18
42,000
-F12 7025,000WN7-816.4
36,900
HD 15629 707,500O4.5V((fc))8.4245,900
HD 37974 70163,000B0.5e10.9922,500 N135 is an emission nebula in Large Magellanic Cloud.
HD 93129 Ab 707,500O2If*7.31
44,000
M33 X-7 B 702,700,000O18.735,000
Sk -69° 194 A 70160,000B0I+WN12.131
45,000
VFTS 125 69.6164,000F516.655,200
NGC 3109-1 69.14,347,000O8I19.3335,150
HD 46150 695,200O5V((f))z6.7344,000
HD 229059 693,000B2Iabe8.726,300
ST2-3 69160,000O5.5V14.26444,900
ST2-32 69160,000O5(f)np13.90345,400
W28-23 69160,000O3.5V(f+)13.70251,300
HD 93403 A 68.510,400O5.5III(fc)var8.27
39,300
HD 93130 6810,000O7II(f)8.0439,900
HM 1-8 6811,000O5III(f)12.5246,100
HSH95-47 68163,000O3III14.7243,500
HSH95-48 68163,000O3III14.7546,500
Westerhout 51-61 6820,000 18.16
38,000
BAT99-93 67165,000O3If*13.44645,000
Sk -69° 200 67160,000B1I11.1826,300
-F18 66.925,000O4-6I16.7
36,900
-F4 66.425,000WN7-815.63
36,800
Z15 66.111,986,000B0.520.49525,000
BAT99-59 A 66165,000WN4b+O8:13.186
71,000
BAT99-104 66165,000O2If*/WN512.563,000
HD 5980 B 66200,000WN4+O7I:11.31
45,000
HD 190429 A 667,800O4If6.63
46,000
LH 31-1003 66160,000O6Ib13.18641,900
LH 114-7 66160,000O2III(f*)+OV13.6650,000 N70 is an emission nebula in Large Magellanic Cloud.
Pismis 24-1SW 666,500 11.140,000
BAT99-126 65165,000WN2.5-3+B1V+O4V+O6.5V13.16671,000
HSH95-40 65163,000O2-3.5V14.5647,500
HSH95-58 65163,000O3III14.847,500
HSH95-89 65163,000 14.7644,000
VFTS 63 65164,000O5III(n)(fc)+sec14.442,200
VFTS 145 65164,000O8fp14.339,800
VFTS 518 65164,000O3.5III(f*)15.1144,700
Westerhout 49-8 6536,200O3-O7V15.617
40,700
BD+43° 3654 64.65,400O4If10.0640,400
BAT99-129 A 64165,000MN3ha+O5V14.701
79,000 DEM L294 is a H II region in Large Magellanic Cloud.
HSH95-50 64163,000 14.6547,000
Sk -69° 25 64160,000OB11.88643,600
Trumpler 27-23 643,900B0.7Ia10.0927,500
Westerhout 49-5 6436,200O3-O5V15.623
42,700
HD 46223 635,200O4V((f))7.2846,000
HD 64568 6316,000O3V((f*))z9.3954,000
HD 303308 639,200O4.5V((fc))8.1751,300
HR 6187 A 634,300O3.5-4III(f*)+O6IV5.54
46,500Septenary
LH 10-3058 63160,000O3V((f*))14.08954,000
ST5-71 63160,000O4.5III13.26645,400
AB9 62197,000WN3ha15.431100,000 DEM S80 is a H II region in Small Magellanic Cloud.
Brey 32 B 62165,000WC4+O6III/V+O12.32
43,600
HD 93160 628,000O7III((f))7.642,700
HSH95-35 62163,000O3V14.4347,500
LH 41-1017 62160,000B112.26642,700
Mercer 30-6a A 6240,000Ofpe/WN910.39
29,900
ST4-18 62160,000O5If13.63944,800
VFTS 664 62164,000O7II(f)13.93739,900
HD 229196 61.65,000O6II(f)8.5940,900
AB8 B 61197,000WO4+O4V12.83
45,000
BAT99-79 A 61165,000WN7ha+OB13.486
42,000
HD 5980 A 61200,000WN4+O7I:11.31
21,000–53,000
LH 41-18 61160,000O8.5V((f))12.58638,500
Mercer 30-9 A 6140,000O9-7I-III12.25
34,500
ST5-25 61160,000O5-6V((f))z13.55148,600
VFTS 422 61164,000O4III(f)15.1439,800
WR 102hb 6126,000WN913.9
25,100
Sk -67° 166 60.68160,000O4Ia12.2241,800 GKK-A144 is a stellar association in Large Magellanic Cloud.
Sk -67° 167 60.68160,000O4If+n12.58641,800
Sk -71° 46 60.68160,000OB13.24141,800 BSDL 2242 is a star cluster in Large Magellanic Cloud.
Brey 10 60165,000WC12.69117,000
Brey 94 A 60165,000WR12.996
83,000
Brey 95a A 60165,000G:12.2
83,000
HSH95-55 60163,000O3V14.7447,500
Mercer 30-7 A 6040,000WN611.516
41,400
R134 60164,000WN6h12.7539,800
R142 60164,000B0Ia11.8218,000
R143 60160,000F7Ia12.01418,000–36,000
Sk -69° 142a 60160,000WN10h11.09334,000
Sk -69° 259 60160,000Be11.9323,000
Var 83 603,000,000LBV16.02718,000–37,000
VFTS 430 60164,000B0.5Ia+((n))Nwk15.1124,500

A few notable large stars with masses less than 60  are shown in the table below for the purpose of comparison, ending with the , which is very close, but would otherwise be too small to be included in the list. At present, all the listed stars are naked-eye visible and relatively nearby.

51.43,1005.0536,000
τ Canis Majoris Aa 505,1204.8932,000
Ab 447,4005.53
33,000
θ2 Orionis A 391,5005.0234,900
α Camelopardalis 37.66,0004.2929,000
375,1004.8218,700 IC 4996 is an open cluster in Cygnus OB1.
ζ1 Scorpii 36 - 538,2104.70517,200
Aa 331,2602.0829,500
θ1 Orionis C1 331,3405.13
39,000
κ Cassiopeiae 334,0004.1623,500
333,2604.9128,000
B 307,5004.3
37,200
B 28.51,2301.83
35,000
1,2501.6925,000
A 27.91,3003.5437,700
26.11,2004.0435,000
1,0802.2540,000 Vela R2 is a OB association in Vela Molecular Ridge.
WR 79a 24.45,6005.7735,000
Aa1 241,2002.5
29,500
ι Orionis Aa1 23.11,3402.77
32,500
κ Crucis 237,5005.9816,300
WR 78 224,1006.4850,100
ο2 Canis Majoris 21.42,8003.04315,500
A 218600.1312,100
ζ Ophiuchi 20.23702.56934,000
υ Orionis 202,9004.61833,400
σ Orionis Aa 181,2604.07
35,000
161,3005.1833,000
15.56502.0926,500
153,2604.23310,800
θ Carinae A 14.94602.76
31,000
θ2 Orionis B 14.81,5006.3829,300
14.57502.8620,800
σ Orionis B 141,2604.07
31,000
β Canis Majoris 13.54901.98523,200
ε Persei A 13.56402.88
26,500
ι Orionis Aa2 13.11,3402.77
27,000
δ Scorpii A 134402.307
27,400
σ Orionis Ab 131,2604.07
29,000
Aa 11.57,4005.53
83,000
A 91,2301.83
57,000
ρ Ophiuchi A 8.73604.63
22,000
7.72501.6421,800
B 7.25505.518,500
A 7.184803.47
18,700
75203.0114,900
6.25804.3116,000
Aa 5.911801.9417,700
Alcyone 5.94402.87
12,300
γ Canis Majoris 5.64404.113,600
η Canis Majoris 5.5 or 9.52,0002.4515,000
ο Velorum 5.54903.616,200
ο Aquarii 4.24404.7113,500
3.653704.6913,400
3.551503.5513,700
η Chamaeleontis 3.23105.45312,500
ε Chamaeleontis 2.873604.9110,900
τ1 Aquarii 2.683205.6610,600
2.641504.1211,000
2.51404.3710,600
10.0000158−26.7445,772 Https://www.iau.org/static/resolutions/IAU2015_English.pdf/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" Https://www.iau.org/static/resolutions/IAU2015_English.pdf< /a>


Black holes
are the end point of the evolution of massive stars. Technically they are not stars, as they no longer generate heat and light via nuclear fusion in their cores. Some may have cosmological origins, and would then never have been stars. This is thought to be especially likely in the cases of the most massive black holes.
  • Stellar black holes are objects with approximately
  • Intermediate-mass black holes range from 100 to
  • Supermassive black holes are in the range of millions or billions .


See also

Footnotes

External links
Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time